[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gnubol: random thoughts

To: gnu-cobol@lusars.net
Subject: Re: gnubol: random thoughts
From: Tim Josling <tej@melbpc.org.au>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 05:38:58 +1000
Delivered-To: gnu-cobol-outgoing@wallace.lusars.net
Organization: Melbourne PC Users Group
References: <199911141835.NAA13971@tivoli.mv.com>
Reply-To: gnu-cobol@lusars.net
Sender: owner-gnu-cobol@wallace.lusars.net

I good idea I think. But it does create a botstrapping issue. How do you
compile a cobol compiler written in cobol?

Maybe we could do nucleus level one in C and insist on everyone using
only nucleus level 1 on their cobol?

Tim Josling

>   Chad> How much of the cobol std can be implemented in cobol?

--
This message was sent through the gnu-cobol mailing list.  To remove yourself
from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@lusars.net with the
words "unsubscribe gnu-cobol" in the message body.  For more information on
the GNU COBOL project, send mail to gnu-cobol-owner@lusars.net.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gnubol: random thoughts
  - From: Chad Slaughter <slaught@advancenet.net>

References:
- Re: gnubol: random thoughts
  - From: Michael McKernan <mck@tivoli.mv.com>

Prev by Date: gnubol: Re: Cost of Backtracking
Next by Date: Re: gnubol: Free-form problem
Prev by thread: Re: gnubol: random thoughts
Next by thread: Re: gnubol: random thoughts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread