Re: gnubol: random thoughts

[Chad Slaughter <slaught@advancenet.net>]

Tim Josling wrote :>
>
>I good idea I think. But it does create a botstrapping issue. How do you
>compile a cobol compiler written in cobol?

No. dont confuse what I said. I didnt say write a cobol compiler in cobol
that wont work. cobol isnt a system language.

this idea i am going for is what features of cobol could be implemented
as thru copy/replace on top of a smaller subset?

could we implement nucleus level 2 in cobol using only nucleus level 1?


-- 
Chad Slaughter  -- slaught at advancenet.net

--
This message was sent through the gnu-cobol mailing list.  To remove yourself
from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@lusars.net with the
words "unsubscribe gnu-cobol" in the message body.  For more information on
the GNU COBOL project, send mail to gnu-cobol-owner@lusars.net.