Re: gnubol: parser rule naming conventions

[Tim Josling <tej@melbpc.org.au>]

I have updated the grammar (but not uploaded - I am going to do
some debugging first). I changed all the tokens to CAPS and all
the productions to just plain names. It would have taken too long
to put initial caps on the production names. It is a lot more
readable, I must admit.

I ran into three name clashes NULL FILE and one other I can't
recall. So I have NULL_word FILE_word and XXX_word.

Some further improvments along the lines you suggested may be
worthwhile later on.

Tim Josling

RKRayhawk@aol.com wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 12/26/99 11:59:31 PM EST, tej@melbpc.org.au writes:
> 
> <<
>  Probably the tk_ is because I am paranoid about namespace
>  pollution. I am happy to change to another standard as you
>  suggest if noone else objects.

--
This message was sent through the gnu-cobol mailing list.  To remove yourself
from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@lusars.net with the
words "unsubscribe gnu-cobol" in the message body.  For more information on
the GNU COBOL project, send mail to gnu-cobol-owner@lusars.net.