Re: gnubol: problem 9

["J & C Migrations, Pty." <migrate@tiac.net>]

At 04:10 AM 12/27/99 EST, RKRayhawk@aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 12/27/99 1:41:34 AM EST, tej@melbpc.org.au writes:
>
><< 
> INSPECT a tallying x for all y ZZZ.
> INSPECT a tallying X for all y ZZZ for leading z.
> 
> So ZZZ could be something else you are counting or something you
> are putting the next count into. I think.
> 
> Take out the magic tokens and see the conflicts, if you have
> bison which I think you said you do.
>  >>
>
>Well I trust you are correct. I have bison and I can not believe how quiet
it 
>is when it scans your rules. Positively erie!
>
>
>But my COBOL manual does not say that you can have a list where your example 
>implies that you think you can:
>
>  INSPECT a tallying x for all y ZZZ.

I checked the COBOL standard, and it allows a list as above.  The
BEFORE/AFTER phrase is conditional, so the repeatition on the outer braces
applys to identifier-3/literal-1

--------------------------------------------------------------------
J & C Migrations, Pty.          
566 Centre Street, Suite 3              http://www.jcmigrations.com
Newton, MA 02458                        Fax: +1 (617) 916-5113
USA                                     Tel. +1 (617) 916-5114

--
This message was sent through the gnu-cobol mailing list.  To remove yourself
from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@lusars.net with the
words "unsubscribe gnu-cobol" in the message body.  For more information on
the GNU COBOL project, send mail to gnu-cobol-owner@lusars.net.