[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnubol: refmod again (fwd)
Hi Mike!
Both you and Randall seem to have missed this one:
(foo + 1) is a single index,
(foo + 0 +1) is two indexes roughly equivalent to (foo 1), and the original
(foo + 0 + 1) is illegal, because as you can see from the format you
quoted below, the [+/- integer-2 ] is not immediately followed by "...",
only the entire group of index specification options has this repeatition
indicator.
Regards,
Jonathan
At 12:09 AM 12/1/99 -0500, Michael McKernan wrote:
>>>>>> "Randall" == Randall Bart <Barticus@att.net>
>>>>>> wrote the following on Tue, 30 Nov 1999 18:10:21 -0800
>
> Randall> At 05:35 AM 11/30/99 , Michael McKernan wrote:
> >> This is apparently legal and represents two subscripts.
> >>
> >> (foo + 0 + 1)
>
> Randall> That looks like one subscript to me. What am I missing?
>
>Maybe it looks different in the proposed standard. Mine says
>
> | integer-1 |
> ( < data-name-2 [+/- integer-2 ] > ... )
> | index-name-1 [+/- integer-3 ] |
>
>And it's pretty unlikely that I would have written anything at
>05:35 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>This message was sent through the gnu-cobol mailing list. To remove yourself
>from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@lusars.net with the
>words "unsubscribe gnu-cobol" in the message body. For more information on
>the GNU COBOL project, send mail to gnu-cobol-owner@lusars.net.
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
J & C Migrations, Pty.
566 Centre Street, Suite 3 http://www.jcmigrations.com
Newton, MA 02458 Fax: +1 (617) 916-5113
USA Tel. +1 (617) 916-5114
--
This message was sent through the gnu-cobol mailing list. To remove yourself
from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@lusars.net with the
words "unsubscribe gnu-cobol" in the message body. For more information on
the GNU COBOL project, send mail to gnu-cobol-owner@lusars.net.