[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gnubol: Parser Technology

To: gnu-cobol@lusars.net
Subject: Re: gnubol: Parser Technology
From: Tim Josling <TIMJOSLING@prodigy.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 03:12:28 +1000
Delivered-To: gnu-cobol-outgoing@wallace.lusars.net
References: <0.d88e2340.256862ff@aol.com>
Reply-To: gnu-cobol@lusars.net
Sender: owner-gnu-cobol@wallace.lusars.net

The standard requires you to recognise all not supported stuff and issue
diagnostics upon request. Take that as assumed in anything I say. This is mostly
easy via some sort of poison keyword thing.

Tim Josling

RKRayhawk@aol.com wrote:

> I would encourage syntax that tolerates some of the segmentation markers.


--
This message was sent through the gnu-cobol mailing list.  To remove yourself
from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@lusars.net with the
words "unsubscribe gnu-cobol" in the message body.  For more information on
the GNU COBOL project, send mail to gnu-cobol-owner@lusars.net.

References:
- Re: gnubol: Parser Technology
  - From: RKRayhawk@aol.com

Prev by Date: Re: gnubol: subsets
Next by Date: Parsing nested statements: was Re: gnubol: subsets
Prev by thread: Re: gnubol: Parser Technology
Next by thread: gnubol: Distro
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread