Re: gnubol: Anyone actually working on Cobol

[Tim Josling <tej@melbpc.org.au>]

I'm happy to do it that way, but ...

This means that development would be restricted to the 'gnu
cobol' environment which will probably only run in Unix, or in
the cygwin32 environment in Win32. Is everyone happy with that?

If not perhaps we should support something for which compilers
are available now. What do people think? 

This does raise the issue of what environments people are using -
I would be interested to hear from people on this point.

Tim Josling

Christopher Clark wrote:
>     IMHO, since pointers are going into the next version of COBOL, we should do
> what the Committee Draft says.  Lessee...  (I'm pulling from CD1.2, so some of this
> may have changed.)


--
This message was sent through the gnu-cobol mailing list.  To remove yourself
from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@lusars.net with the
words "unsubscribe gnu-cobol" in the message body.  For more information on
the GNU COBOL project, send mail to gnu-cobol-owner@lusars.net.