Re: gnubol: Anyone actually working on Cobol

["Justin C. Ferguson" <jferg@lusArs.net>]

When last we left our heros, they were speaking of:
> This means that development would be restricted to the 'gnu
> cobol' environment which will probably only run in Unix, or in
> the cygwin32 environment in Win32. Is everyone happy with that?

> If not perhaps we should support something for which compilers
> are available now. What do people think? 

	Don't know about the technical feasability of it, but what about a 
	modular system... The base system supports what's in the standard 
	only, but we allow add-on modules to make it compatible with 
	the various commercial compilers...would probably be a real pain
	in the ass to do, but would be cool.

								JF

-- 
  Justin Ferguson - Geek of All Trades - Technical Solutions Consultant
http://www.lusArs.net/jferg/        <jferg@geeks.com>  <jferg@lusArs.net> 
                     A hollow voice says, "Plugh".

--
This message was sent through the gnu-cobol mailing list.  To remove yourself
from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@lusars.net with the
words "unsubscribe gnu-cobol" in the message body.  For more information on
the GNU COBOL project, send mail to gnu-cobol-owner@lusars.net.