[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gnubol: New bison Grammar available (long)

To: gnu-cobol@lusars.net
Subject: Re: gnubol: New bison Grammar available (long)
From: RKRayhawk@aol.com
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 23:10:24 EST
Delivered-To: gnu-cobol-outgoing@wallace.lusars.net
Reply-To: gnu-cobol@lusars.net
Sender: owner-gnu-cobol@wallace.lusars.net

I have a simple question. Why are we naming tokens in the fashion of
tk_tokenname?

WHy not just names like
ADD
PERFORM
VARYING
etc.?

Wouldn't the grammar be easier to read that way?

-Bob Rayhawk

--
This message was sent through the gnu-cobol mailing list.  To remove yourself
from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@lusars.net with the
words "unsubscribe gnu-cobol" in the message body.  For more information on
the GNU COBOL project, send mail to gnu-cobol-owner@lusars.net.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gnubol: New bison Grammar available (long)
  - From: Tim Josling <tej@melbpc.org.au>

Prev by Date: Not long (Re: gnubol: New bison Grammar available (long))
Next by Date: gnubol: Problem 10
Prev by thread: Re: gnubol: New bison Grammar available (long)
Next by thread: Re: gnubol: New bison Grammar available (long)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread