Re: PERFORM token (was RE: gnubol: Hacks needed to parse COBOL

[Davyd Ondrejko <david.ondrejko@safelite.com>]

> If you mean (by "same") that it "gets an error" - then I don't believe
> you that this gets an error under CURRENT Micro Focus compilers under
> UNIX (at least using the '85 Standard option).  That is TOTALLY
> conforming code and any compiler that rejects it - has  a BUG.

That shop used/uses the current MF compiler -- and if it wasn't '85 then
it would have barfed on more than just that!  If was hoping that someone
using MicroFocus could try that structure and confirm whether I'm
getting good information or just babbling.


-- 
David R. Ondrejko - EDI/Referral - Safelite Glass Co.
 Mathematician by training - Programmer by trade - Philosopher by nature
 Genius by genetics - Atheist by conviction - Hedonist by desire!

--
This message was sent through the gnu-cobol mailing list.  To remove yourself
from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@lusars.net with the
words "unsubscribe gnu-cobol" in the message body.  For more information on
the GNU COBOL project, send mail to gnu-cobol-owner@lusars.net.