[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IBM Compilers (was RE: gnubol: How do we parse this language,anyway?

To: gnu-cobol@lusars.net
Subject: Re: IBM Compilers (was RE: gnubol: How do we parse this language,anyway?
From: Tim Josling <TIMJOSLING@prodigy.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 1999 07:46:34 +1000
Delivered-To: gnu-cobol-outgoing@wallace.lusars.net
References: <NBBBJPGEPBMHMOJGKPFFCEKFDFAA.wmklein@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: gnu-cobol@lusars.net
Sender: owner-gnu-cobol@wallace.lusars.net

Bill,
Just one short example would suffice,
Tim Josling

> Note2: If anyone wants me to provide detailed examples of the NOT with
> combined abbreviated conditional differences - which was actually a
> difference between the '68 and '74 ANSI Standards - and which is controlled
> by the explicit LANGLVL compiler option of OS/VS COBOL and DOS/VS COBOL,
> please let me know.


--
This message was sent through the gnu-cobol mailing list.  To remove yourself
from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@lusars.net with the
words "unsubscribe gnu-cobol" in the message body.  For more information on
the GNU COBOL project, send mail to gnu-cobol-owner@lusars.net.

Follow-Ups:
- gnubol: IBM and combined abbreviated conditional expressions
  - From: "William M. Klein" <wmklein@ix.netcom.com>

References:
- RE: IBM Compilers (was RE: gnubol: How do we parse this language,anyway?
  - From: "William M. Klein" <wmklein@ix.netcom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: gnubol: Hacks needed to parse COBOL
Next by Date: gnubol: sticky blocks
Prev by thread: RE: IBM Compilers (was RE: gnubol: How do we parse this language,anyway?
Next by thread: gnubol: IBM and combined abbreviated conditional expressions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread