Re: Nested Conditionals (was RE: gnubol: Braiding #1 #2 #3

[Tim Josling <TIMJOSLING@prodigy.net>]

Bill,

Thanks. I changed it based on this so the nested conditionals are now errors
except where allowed. In terms of effort it doesn't make much difference as it
turns out. You need to parse it as nested conditionals anyway so you can handle
the size error/not size error correctly and flag the plausable errors (see my
other email).

Tim Josling.

"William M. Klein" wrote:

> would you object to allowing nested conditionals provided
> > that any
> > extension is flagged, and that standard conforming code works as per the
> > standard.
> Given my choice, this is one place that I really would prefer sticking to the
> Standard.



--
This message was sent through the gnu-cobol mailing list.  To remove yourself
from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@lusars.net with the
words "unsubscribe gnu-cobol" in the message body.  For more information on
the GNU COBOL project, send mail to gnu-cobol-owner@lusars.net.