Re: gnubol: Hacks needed to parse COBOL

[Tim Josling <TIMJOSLING@prodigy.net>]

It could also be multiply defined, with multiple references to come. Or it could
be deifned as a data name but also to be defined in an upcoming procedure name. Or
it could just not be defined at all. At least you would need to revisit it
afterwards and make sure your assumption is correct.

Tim Josling

"J & C Migrations, Pty." wrote:

> Since *M* is not
> a reserved word, it must be a reference to either a known procedure, or one
> yet to be defined.
>
> Regards,
> Jonathan


--
This message was sent through the gnu-cobol mailing list.  To remove yourself
from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@lusars.net with the
words "unsubscribe gnu-cobol" in the message body.  For more information on
the GNU COBOL project, send mail to gnu-cobol-owner@lusars.net.