[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gnubol: COBOL and C

To: gnu-cobol@lusars.net
Subject: Re: gnubol: COBOL and C
From: Tim Josling <TIMJOSLING@prodigy.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 02:31:17 +1000
Delivered-To: gnu-cobol-outgoing@wallace.lusars.net
References: <199912010025.TAA17818@tivoli.mv.com> <38447AF6.AA8D3AEB@prodigy.net> <3.0.3.32.19991201081015.006e0dfc@tiac.net>
Reply-To: gnu-cobol@lusars.net
Sender: owner-gnu-cobol@wallace.lusars.net

Yes it should be binary.
Tim Josling

"J & C Migrations, Pty." wrote:

> As a conversions expert, allow me to recommend against the use of USAGE
> COMP as in the example below.


--
This message was sent through the gnu-cobol mailing list.  To remove yourself
from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@lusars.net with the
words "unsubscribe gnu-cobol" in the message body.  For more information on
the GNU COBOL project, send mail to gnu-cobol-owner@lusars.net.

References:
- Re: gnubol: How do we parse this language, anyway?
  - From: Michael McKernan <mck@tivoli.mv.com>
- Re: gnubol: How do we parse this language, anyway?
  - From: Tim Josling <TIMJOSLING@prodigy.net>
- Re: gnubol: COBOL and C
  - From: "J & C Migrations, Pty." <migrate@tiac.net>

Prev by Date: Re: gnubol: COBOL and C
Next by Date: Re: gnubol: refmod again (fwd)
Prev by thread: Re: gnubol: COBOL and C
Next by thread: Re: Re: gnubol: Anyone actually working on Cobol
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread