Re: gnubol: A question

[Michael McKernan <mck@tivoli.mv.com>]

OK, I've gotten two of the three possible answers so far.  Is anyone
willing to defend the third one?

Chris says "Then, IMHO, it should fall down and die."

Fred says "...the second option is correct"

I tend to agree with Chris, Let's go on.  I see nothing in the
standard to indicate that abbreviation has any influence on grouping,
so if my example had been written without parentheses thusly

	IF a = b OR  c < d AND e < f OR g

we could probably agree that the implied last term is "e < g", right?
But the _implied_ grouping, because "and" binds more closely than "or",
must be just as it was written originally:

	IF a = b OR ( c < d AND e < f ) OR g

We are propagating the subject and relation from a factor to a term.
I guess that's the way it is, but it makes me a little
uncomfortable.  It also means, that if Fred is right, making the
implied grouping explicit, changes the semantics of the phrase
profoundly.  Now you can say "Ick", Chris.




--
This message was sent through the gnu-cobol mailing list.  To remove yourself
from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@lusars.net with the
words "unsubscribe gnu-cobol" in the message body.  For more information on
the GNU COBOL project, send mail to gnu-cobol-owner@lusars.net.