[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnubol: A question
Fred Neale wrote:
> In Christopher's example, most compilers would (or should) fall over as 'Z'
> would be a duplicated name, regardless of the fact that it is a
> CONDITION-NAME. Compilation would fail during working-storage parse.
1) It wasn't my example. It was transcribed from the paper at
<http://adam.wins.uva.nl/~x/coboldef/coboldef.html>. Don't shoot the
messenger. :-)
2) Only one of the Z definitions would be included (the other was commented
out), the point was that the expression parses differently depending on which
definition of Z was included.
(Wargh... I just realized I deleted the second-level name... Ah, here we
go... Michael McKernan wrote)
> > than later in he compilation. The problem was cited by Christopher
> > Clark and I have included the relevant part of his message at the end
> > of this one.
Ick. I really must shorten that to Chris in my mailer. I feel like I'm in
trouble now...
> > My question is really about abbreviated conditionals, apart from this
> > classic gotcha. What effect do parenthesized expressions have on
> > abbreviation? If I encounter the following
> >
> > IF a = b OR ( c < d AND e < f ) OR g
> >
> > and "g" is indeed a simple variable, should I interpret this to mean
Then, IMHO, it should fall down and die. Abbreviated conditionals (the `OR
g' portion) can only come immediately after a pure relational-condition (`a =
b'), according to every COBOL grammar I've got (CD 1.7 included). `g' would
have to be an 88-level or a switch-condition, which look exactly identical in an
expression, but are declared in two different divisions of a source file. (Have
I said Ick yet? :-) Ick, ick, ick, ick, ick.)
--
Christopher Clark compudata@cadvision.com ICQ#9342023
I don't even dream of being able to speak for my company...
When all you have is a nailgun, every problem looks like a messiah.
--
This message was sent through the gnu-cobol mailing list. To remove yourself
from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@lusars.net with the
words "unsubscribe gnu-cobol" in the message body. For more information on
the GNU COBOL project, send mail to gnu-cobol-owner@lusars.net.