[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[coldsync-hackers] Re: linux, usb, palmos 4.0, 4.1
- To: coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net
- Subject: [coldsync-hackers] Re: linux, usb, palmos 4.0, 4.1
- From: Alessandro Zummo <azummo-coldsync2 at towertech dot it>
- Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 11:48:29 +0100
- In-Reply-To: <20021026235640.A18475@baa.ooblick.com>
- Organization: Tower Technologies
- Reply-To: coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net
- Sender: owner-coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net
On 27-Ott-02 at 04:56:40,
Andrew Arensburger <arensb+CShackers@ooblick.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 12:16:05AM +0100, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
>> On 24-Ott-02 at 21:05:39,
>> ed <spied@yandex.ru> wrote:
>>> may be today is time to remove simple protocol from coldsync source?
>>
>> Well, yes. I first want to be sure that i haven't break anything.
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't removing the simple
> protocol break syncing with a serial cradle? That's what I'm currently
> doing, actually. Besides, "use a serial cradle" has traditionally been
> one of the fallback solutions for people with hardware that isn't
> supported just yet.
The only difference between simple and net was a little piece of
code in netsync.c . The recent change should have made coldsync
smart enough to handle that difference automatically,
so that the "net" protocol could be used in place of the "simple" one.
btw, wasn't the "full" protocol the one used across serial connections?
--
- alex.
--
This message was sent through the coldsync-hackers mailing list. To remove
yourself from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@thedotin.net
with the words "unsubscribe coldsync-hackers" in the message body. For more
information on Coldsync, send mail to coldsync-hackers-owner@thedotin.net.