RE: [coldsync-hackers] Re: Getting started on palm <-> network/database based syncronization

["Brian Johnson" <bjohnson at jecinc dot on.ca>]

I haven't seen anyone able to use xinetd as a daemon

I was under the impression that xinetd and inetd were very similar

Can anyone confirm that they have been using inetd with coldsync and provide
their configuration?



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-coldsync-hackers@lusars.net
> [mailto:owner-coldsync-hackers@lusars.net]On Behalf Of Alex Tronin
> Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 8:48 AM
> To: coldsync-hackers@lusars.net
> Subject: Re: [coldsync-hackers] Re: Getting started on palm <->
> network/database based syncronization
>
>
> > The reason behind the choice to not make coldsync a forking daemon
> > is based on the following factors:
> >
> >  - we aren't sure that coldsync can be considered stable
> I am running coldsync for a month or more in a row - nothing bad happens.
> >  - we aren't sure it hasn't any memory leak
> It seems to be no, but no proof.
> >  - the same effect can be obtained by using inetd.
> It requires much more modifications, than just forking
>
> Alex Tronin
>
> --
> This message was sent through the coldsync-hackers mailing list.
> To remove
> yourself from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@thedotin.net
> with the words "unsubscribe coldsync-hackers" in the message
> body.  For more
> information on Coldsync, send mail to coldsync-hackers-owner@thedotin.net.
>


-- 
This message was sent through the coldsync-hackers mailing list.  To remove
yourself from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@thedotin.net
with the words "unsubscribe coldsync-hackers" in the message body.  For more
information on Coldsync, send mail to coldsync-hackers-owner@thedotin.net.