[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [coldsync-hackers] Re: Getting started on palm <-> network/database based syncronization
- To: <coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net>
- Subject: Re: [coldsync-hackers] Re: Getting started on palm <-> network/database based syncronization
- From: "Alex Tronin" <at at urbis dot net>
- Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 08:48:27 -0400
- Organization: Urbis.Net Ltd
- References: <yam9043.2381.143563048@mail.galactica.it>
- Reply-To: coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net
- Sender: owner-coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net
> The reason behind the choice to not make coldsync a forking daemon
> is based on the following factors:
>
> - we aren't sure that coldsync can be considered stable
I am running coldsync for a month or more in a row - nothing bad happens.
> - we aren't sure it hasn't any memory leak
It seems to be no, but no proof.
> - the same effect can be obtained by using inetd.
It requires much more modifications, than just forking
Alex Tronin
--
This message was sent through the coldsync-hackers mailing list. To remove
yourself from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@thedotin.net
with the words "unsubscribe coldsync-hackers" in the message body. For more
information on Coldsync, send mail to coldsync-hackers-owner@thedotin.net.