[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [coldsync-hackers] Re: Redux: Netsync + [X]inetd
- To: coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net
- Subject: Re: [coldsync-hackers] Re: Redux: Netsync + [X]inetd
- From: Rob Bloodgood <robb at empire2 dot com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 00:21:44 -0800 (PST)
- In-Reply-To: <012901c1c003$5f8bd900$0101a8c0@ALEX>
- Reply-To: coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net
- Sender: owner-coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net
> > Is there a document (or section of code or scribbled notes) that lists
> this interaction?
> Idea to remove udp code for ColdSync is right.
> I don't see any problems with NetSync - ColdSync should start on TCP
> connection.
> Can be done 2 ways:
> 1) From inetd/xinetd
> 2) Bind port 14238 and fork on incoming connection
> Either way is simple, nothing to discuss.
Great. Which way did YOU do it?
L8r,
Rob
--
This message was sent through the coldsync-hackers mailing list. To remove
yourself from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@thedotin.net
with the words "unsubscribe coldsync-hackers" in the message body. For more
information on Coldsync, send mail to coldsync-hackers-owner@thedotin.net.