[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[coldsync-hackers] Re: Redux: Netsync + [X]inetd



 On 26-Feb-02 at 05:33:08,
  Alex Tronin <at@urbis.net> wrote:

> My resolution:
> 1) ColdSync in netsync mode should listen on both ports independently -
> which calls to have UDP daemon like pi-csd running separately
> 2) running netsync from inetd.conf or xinetd.conf calls for serious code
> rewriting - stdin is incoming TCP/IP connection to PDA and stdout is
> outgoing TCP/IP connection - so extensive modifications are required.

> So, I think best way to have coldsync running as standalone server for TCP
> and another small daemon for UDP

There's  a think i can't understand:

last week i tried coldsync in netsync mode and worked perfectly. Why do we
need to use a netcat or (x)inetd wrapper?

-- 

  - alex.



-- 
This message was sent through the coldsync-hackers mailing list.  To remove
yourself from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@thedotin.net
with the words "unsubscribe coldsync-hackers" in the message body.  For more
information on Coldsync, send mail to coldsync-hackers-owner@thedotin.net.