Re: gnubol: which list, and cobol.el

[Matthew Vanecek <linux4us@home.com>]

Tim Josling wrote:
> 
> They are both official, for different projects.
> 
> By the way, an easy upgrade for the cobol.el would be to put some
> cobol-esque abbrevs in it.
> 
> Tim Josling
> 
> Matthew Vanecek wrote:
> >
> > Which is the official list nowadays? :)  Good to have a home.  I've had
> > a temporary position change at work (going to do 2nd tier support for a
> > while--blech!), so I think I'll have a little more time to devote to
> > coding.
> >
> > Matthew Vanecek

Duly noted.  abbrevs were never implemented--I guess the original
developer never got to it.  I will, soon.  The thing to decide is,
what's important enough to include as an abbrev?  Consider opinions
solicited...

Are you wanting to maintain gnu-cobol and cobolforgcc as two seperate
projects?  How's that gonna work?

-- 
Matthew Vanecek
perl -e 'print
$i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);'
********************************************************************************
For 93 million miles, there is nothing between the sun and my shadow
except me.
I'm always getting in the way of something...

--
This message was sent through the gnu-cobol mailing list.  To remove yourself
from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@lusars.net with the
words "unsubscribe gnu-cobol" in the message body.  For more information on
the GNU COBOL project, send mail to gnu-cobol-owner@lusars.net.