[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

gnubol: How are grammars progressing

To: gnu-cobol@lusars.net
Subject: gnubol: How are grammars progressing
From: RKRayhawk@aol.com
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 1999 00:13:42 EST
Delivered-To: gnu-cobol-outgoing@wallace.lusars.net
Reply-To: gnu-cobol@lusars.net
Sender: owner-gnu-cobol@wallace.lusars.net

    
Have the bison or PCCTS grammars progressed? Where do we stand with these 
important and valuable contributions? Are there any more postings of recent 
grammars?


Best Wishes,
Bob Rayhawk
RKRayhawk@aol.com

--
This message was sent through the gnu-cobol mailing list.  To remove yourself
from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@lusars.net with the
words "unsubscribe gnu-cobol" in the message body.  For more information on
the GNU COBOL project, send mail to gnu-cobol-owner@lusars.net.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gnubol: How are grammars progressing
  - From: Tim Josling <tej@melbpc.org.au>

Prev by Date: gnubol: FW: IBM S/390 Support is now merged into the Linux 2.2 kernel
Next by Date: Re: gnubol: How are grammars progressing
Prev by thread: gnubol: FW: IBM S/390 Support is now merged into the Linux 2.2 kernel
Next by thread: Re: gnubol: How are grammars progressing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread