[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gnubol: Anyone actually working on Cobol





David L. Nicol wrote (in part) on 13/11/99

>  With a dynamic sort of architechture that loads verbs in
>  from a directory full of "verb definition files" which describe
>  in a system-internal language the meaning of the verb, allowing
>  for variant spellings could be as easy as
>
>  ln PERFORM PREFORM
>
>
>  Although portability would be maintained better by preprepreprocessing
>  with
>
>  sed s/PREFORM/PERFORM/g

Why not just spell it right in the first place?

Fred Neale




--
This message was sent through the gnu-cobol mailing list.  To remove yourself
from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@lusars.net with the
words "unsubscribe gnu-cobol" in the message body.  For more information on
the GNU COBOL project, send mail to gnu-cobol-owner@lusars.net.