[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnubol: Anyone actually working on Cobol
David L. Nicol wrote (in part) on 13/11/99
> With a dynamic sort of architechture that loads verbs in
> from a directory full of "verb definition files" which describe
> in a system-internal language the meaning of the verb, allowing
> for variant spellings could be as easy as
>
> ln PERFORM PREFORM
>
>
> Although portability would be maintained better by preprepreprocessing
> with
>
> sed s/PREFORM/PERFORM/g
Why not just spell it right in the first place?
Fred Neale
--
This message was sent through the gnu-cobol mailing list. To remove yourself
from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@lusars.net with the
words "unsubscribe gnu-cobol" in the message body. For more information on
the GNU COBOL project, send mail to gnu-cobol-owner@lusars.net.