Re: [GNU-COBOL] grammar

[David Essex <dessex@aracnet.net>]

On 24/06/99, Tim Underwood wrote:

> ...
> ... what "yacc" tool are you using?  I'm sure the standard bison, etc. 
>tools won't work, as it appears Cobol will require a LALR(3)/(4) parser, 
>at least.  
I agree.

From your experience what problems will arise in using bison, and could you
give a concrete example ?

> ...
> ... I've also stumbled on btyacc, that sounds like it might handle the job. 
In my experience btyacc is a little unstable.


David



--
This message was sent through the gnu-cobol mailing list.  To remove yourself
from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@acm.cs.umr.edu with the
words "unsubscribe gnu-cobol" in the message body.  For more information on
the GNU COBOL project, send mail to gnu-cobol-owner@acm.cs.umr.edu.