[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [coldsync-hackers] VFS hackery

To: coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net
Subject: Re: [coldsync-hackers] VFS hackery
From: Alessandro Zummo <azummo-coldsync3 at towertech dot it>
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:02:44 +0200
In-reply-to: <200507292219.15597.christophe.beauregard@sympatico.ca>
Organization: Tower Technologies
References: <200507292219.15597.christophe.beauregard@sympatico.ca>
Reply-to: coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net
Sender: owner-coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net

On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:19:14 -0400
Christophe Beauregard <christophe.beauregard@sympatico.ca> wrote:

> Hi all.
> 
> I've been playing around with some VFS conduits and I figure I'd see if I 
> can get some feedback on my approach (as usual, I'm tracking CVS here).

 [..]

> Does this approach make any sense at all? Useful to anyone?


 Hi,

   I'm quite usy but I always review your CVS commits.. it makes sense to me,
 we can maybe even include them with stock coldsync.

-- 

 Best regards,

 Alessandro Zummo,
  Tower Technologies - Turin, Italy

  http://www.towertech.it

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [coldsync-hackers] VFS hackery
  - From: Christophe Beauregard <christophe.beauregard@sympatico.ca>

References:
- [coldsync-hackers] VFS hackery
  - From: Christophe Beauregard <christophe.beauregard@sympatico.ca>

Prev by Date: [coldsync-hackers] VFS hackery
Next by Date: Re: [coldsync-hackers] VFS hackery
Previous by thread: [coldsync-hackers] VFS hackery
Next by thread: Re: [coldsync-hackers] VFS hackery
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread