[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [coldsync-hackers] segmentation fault on sync with new palm

To: coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net
Subject: Re: [coldsync-hackers] segmentation fault on sync with new palm
From: Christophe Beauregard <christophe dot beauregard at sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 18:20:17 -0500
In-reply-to: <1103226452.4044.18.camel@cbacc-security3>
References: <1103223684.4044.16.camel@cbacc-security3> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0412161418100.14405@angst.gnu-designs.com> <1103226452.4044.18.camel@cbacc-security3>
Reply-to: coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net
Sender: owner-coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net
User-agent: KMail/1.7.1

On Thursday 16 December 2004 14:47, Ed Davison wrote:

> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x0804b2cd in run_mode_Standalone (argc=0, argv=0xbffff4ec)
>     at coldsync.c:621

run_mode_Standalone() was moved to runmode.c in mid-2002. So you're running 
2.2.5?

c.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [coldsync-hackers] segmentation fault on sync with new palm
  - From: Ed Davison <bfdi533@cbacc-security3.mccombs.utexas.edu>

References:
- [coldsync-hackers] segmentation fault on sync with new palm
  - From: Ed Davison <bfdi533@cbacc-security3.mccombs.utexas.edu>
- Re: [coldsync-hackers] segmentation fault on sync with new palm
  - From: "David A. Desrosiers" <hacker@gnu-designs.com>
- Re: [coldsync-hackers] segmentation fault on sync with new palm
  - From: Ed Davison <bfdi533@cbacc-security3.mccombs.utexas.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [coldsync-hackers] segmentation fault on sync with new palm
Next by Date: Re: [coldsync-hackers] segmentation fault on sync with new palm
Previous by thread: Re: [coldsync-hackers] segmentation fault on sync with new palm
Next by thread: Re: [coldsync-hackers] segmentation fault on sync with new palm
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread