[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [coldsync-hackers] approaching three point zero
- To: coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net
- Subject: Re: [coldsync-hackers] approaching three point zero
- From: Christophe Beauregard <christophe dot beauregard at sympatico.ca>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 23:40:47 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20041021222124.651304e3@inspiron>
- References: <20041021222124.651304e3@inspiron>
- Reply-to: coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net
- Sender: owner-coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net
- User-agent: KMail/1.6.2
On Thursday 21 October 2004 16:21, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> Andrew make me notice that 3.0-pre4 is quite old so
> I would like to release ColdSync 3.0 in the next few days...
>
> If any of you has critical bug reports or simple patches
> to commit, please do it now.
I don't have anything outstanding, but I do want to point out a fairly major
problem (and this is more for Andrew) that should be addressed with a
coldsync/palm-perl release:
p5-Palm isn't a well-behaved CPAN module. We (Palm:: module uploaders)
really want to be able to reference p5-Palm as a dependency (PM_PREREQ)
and, well, that just doesn't happen with the current CPAN version. This
breaks 'cpan install Palm::Blah' and causes the CPAN smoke testing to
generate many erroneous test reports on perfectly good Palm:: modules.
Not sure what exactly needs to be done to fix it (it _looks_ sane to me),
but I'd really like to see something sorted out in the 3.0 timeframe.
c.