[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [coldsync-hackers] Re: make install
- To: coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net
- Subject: Re: [coldsync-hackers] Re: make install
- From: "Adam Hull" <adam at terralab dot com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 22:24:43 +0000
- Reply-To: coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net
- Sender: owner-coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net
Attached is the patch I am attempting to use.
I wouldn't mind seeing coldsync use inetd either but I heard it needs
rewritten to do so. But I would much rather coldsync work as a standalone
network daemon which this patch is supposed to do.
Alessandro Zummo (azummo-coldsync2@towertech.it) wrote*:
>
> On 19-Ott-02 at 22:38:58,
> Adam Hull <adam@terralab.com> wrote:
>
>
>> The patch I am applying is Rob Bloodgood's coldsync daemon patch.
>> But I wouldn't think that a patch could affect the make process. can it?
>
>Ys, but it shouldn't.
>
>> It is only modifying coldsync-2.2.5/libpconn/PConnection_net.c AFAICT.
>> Does anyone have any idea why this would happen?
>
>no, at least not without seeing the patch itself.
>
>btw, i would be very happy if someone could try to use coldsync with inetd,
>as proposed a few days ago. coldsync shoud be configured with a serial
>type listen block, net protocol ad given stdin/stdout (-) as the device.
>
>--
>
> - alex.
coldsync-2.2.5-daemon.patch