[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [coldsync-hackers] Ritual Packets and origination of long arguments
- To: coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net
- Subject: Re: [coldsync-hackers] Ritual Packets and origination of long arguments
- From: Andrew Arensburger <arensb+CShackers at ooblick dot com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 12:11:31 -0500
- In-Reply-To: <200203061102.g26B2js31913@ns3.safety.net>; from cbiffle@safety.net on Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 04:04:01AM -0700
- References: <200203061102.g26B2js31913@ns3.safety.net>
- Reply-To: coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net
- Sender: owner-coldsync-hackers at lusars dot net
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 04:04:01AM -0700, Cliff L. Biffle wrote:
> I've been picking through the exchanges with my Clie T415 (OS4.1). The
> initial data exchange very much resembles the 'ritual packets' seen in the
> wild with the m500, with a few differences.
[...]
> I'm new to DLP, and I'm aware that the Palm isn't supposed to originate long
> arguments (according to comments in the code), but this seems to fit eerily
> well with both the data and the structures laid out in dlp.h. Thoughts?
Thanks for the detective work!
The next question is, can you hack up a ritual exchange that
reliably works for you? (Possibly after doing great violence to the
code.)
Can it then be fixed to work for others? If this is in fact a
large-arguments version of DLP, can this stuff be generalized? And,
well, further questions.
--
Andrew Arensburger This message *does* represent the
arensb@ooblick.com views of ooblick.com
Tofu: the other white meat substitute.
--
This message was sent through the coldsync-hackers mailing list. To remove
yourself from this mailing list, send a message to majordomo@thedotin.net
with the words "unsubscribe coldsync-hackers" in the message body. For more
information on Coldsync, send mail to coldsync-hackers-owner@thedotin.net.